How do Withholding Tax Rates Influence BEPS Strategies?

BEPS is base erosion and profit shifting, i.e., tax avoidance strategies for multinational companies that exploit loopholes and mismatches in tax rules. These companies reduce their overall tax burden through profit-shifting from high-tax jurisdictions into low- or no-tax jurisdictions.

Some global responses include the BEPS action plan initiated by various global organizations like the OECD and other initiatives on Inclusive Frameworks to combat BEPS. Among several factors influencing the BEPS strategy, the significance of withholding tax rates is considerable.

The article discusses withholding tax rates, their working under BEPS strategies, and some broader implications for the taxation of international investors.

The Role of Withholding Taxes in BEPS

Some of the varying characteristics of a withholding tax among countries should be an issue of utmost consideration for multinationals in framing their corporate structures and tax strategies. Withholding tax rates will affect BEPS strategy in several ways, namely:

Profit Shifting to Low-Tax Jurisdictions

This term involves profit shifting: the transfer of profits from the high-tax jurisdiction to low-tax or no-tax jurisdictions. This is thus one of the most frequent BEPS strategies, and this allows MNCs to reduce their total tax burden.

Primarily, taxation issues arise when profits cross borders; in such a case, regimes taxing withholdings become relevant. When withholding tax rates are high, a company shifting profits would not find it as advantageous as low withholding tax rates.

Treaty shopping

Treaty shopping is one of the other significant BEPS strategies that multinational corporations use to minimize their tax burdens. Such countries usually enter into double taxation treaties (DTTs) to alleviate income from double taxation; these treaties often provide reduced withholding tax rates on cross-border payments.

Treaty shopping is routing income through intermediary entities in countries that provide advantageous tax treaties.

Debt Shifting and Thin Capitalization

Multinationals often use debt shifting as a method of reducing taxable profits in high-tax countries. Debt shifting is the strategic utilization of intercompany loans wherein, typically, profits are shifted out of high-tax countries and into low-tax countries.

Typically, interest payments on loans are tax-deductible, so MNCs take advantage of this and reduce taxable income in high-tax jurisdictions.One of the most important countermeasures against debt shifting is thin capitalization rules, a way to limit leverage versus equity in a company.

Thin capitalization rules, though often part of BEPS-related legislation, are supposed to combat abusive debt shifting. Countries also use withholding taxes as an additional step to ensure that receipts with tax will be received on cross-border interest payments so that MNCs cannot use debt shifting aggressively.

Royalties and Intellectual Property (IP) Migration

For many multinational enterprises, intellectual property is a global asset; one commonly used BEPS strategy involves migrating intellectual property to low-tax jurisdictions. Companies transfer their intellectual property to jurisdictions in the form of royalties that are taxed at very low rates.

Withholding taxes for royalty paid to non-residents vary and are noticeably different with the existence of a tax treaty between countries.If the company holds its IP in some jurisdiction with little or no withholding taxes for royalty payments, it can top off large amounts of income while minimizing tax liabilities.

If the source country imposes high withholding taxes on royalty payments, the benefit from the transfer of IP to a low-tax jurisdiction is diminished. Tax treaties play a crucial role here because the withholding tax rates on royalty payments are usually deducted significantly.

Global Efforts to Address Withholding Tax Abuse and BEPS

The OECD and G20 have been in the lead in taking measures against BEPS-again, especially in its form through withholding tax differential exploitation.

The OECD’s BEPS Action Plan reads as a 15-step measure towards better clarity, less loopholes, and proper tax on profits at their source. Some of these directly address withholding tax approaches.

Action 2: Hybrid Mismatch Arrangements

Hybrid mismatch arrangements exploit differences in tax treatment between jurisdictions, one of which may be withholding tax treatment. Action 2 seeks to neutralize such mismatches so that no company can use hybrid entities or instruments to avoid withholding taxes.

Action 4: Limiting Base Erosion via Deductions on Interest

This action falls on debt shifting by setting ceilings on the deductibility of interest for tax purposes. Since this action undermines the efficiency of debt shifting, thereby indirectly limiting withholding tax differentials used as BEPs strategies.

Action 5: Counter Harmful Tax Practices

Action 5 seeks better transparency in the treatment of intellectual property and also the overall use of tax incentives. Although most countries provide specific tax regimes that offer preferential tax treatments for income derived from IP, this action ensures that such regimes will not be discovered in artificial withholding tax burdens.

Action 6: Preventing Abuse of Treaties

Curbing treaty shopping has incorporated measures to ensure that treaties are not misused by making use of provisions such as PPT and LOB. These rules try to avoid misuse of the entity when intermediary entities are created solely to benefit from favorable withholding tax rates under double tax treaties.

Plan your tax compliance with Eqvista!

Countries are constantly changing the withholding tax policies to attract foreign investment while maintaining their tax base against aggressive tax planning. Because the international tax rules keep changing, multinational companies have to constantly upgrade the BEPS strategy to avoid noncompliance and lower tax liabilities.

The services Eqvista offers allow businesses to collaborate with professional tax planners and take appropriate steps toward tax compliance. We handle cap tables, provide 409A valuations, and address all equity management in ensuring compliance with corporate tax strategies for your startups. Contact our experts today to get planned tax strategy that will keep in line with your expansion plans, answering all regulatory requirements.